This browser does not support the Video element.
SCOTUS case could affect lobbyists, donors and family of elected officials
Public officials aren't allowed to take bribes. Neither are public employees. But what about people who are close to public officials, such as lobbyists or family members? The Supreme Court considered that question on Monday. FOX 5's Chief Legal Correspondent Katie Barlow breaks it down.
WASHINGTON (FOX 5 DC) - Public officials aren't allowed to take bribes. Neither are public employees. But what about people who are close to public officials, such as lobbyists or family members? The Supreme Court considered that question on Monday.
"When a public official accepts money to convince the government to do something, we call him a crook. But when a private citizen accepts money to convince the government to do something, we call him a lobbyist."
That's the opening line of Joe Percoco's brief. Percoco is a former top aide to Andrew Cuomo, the former governor of New York. Percoco was convicted of bribery-related charges for taking money from a real estate developer.
READ MORE: Lawmakers urge action after report of other SCOTUS leak
However, Percoco took the money during an eight-month window after leaving Cuomo's office and before joining it again.
Now, the question is: Was Percoco close enough to being a public employee or someone with enough influence over public officials to get charged under federal bribery laws?
After oral arguments Monday morning, it sounds like the Supreme Court isn't willing to stretch bribery laws quite that far.
This browser does not support the Video element.
In The Courts: Shannon Bream talks new SCOTUS term
FOX News Sunday host and 15-year veteran of the Supreme Court Press Corps Shannon Bream joins In The Courts to help break down what the country can expect as SCOTUS starts its new term.
Percoco was a private citizen when the pocketed about $35,000 to push a real estate deal through. He was not on the government payroll at the time he took the money, and he was not acting in an official position.
If it is ruled that he can be charged, that could open up a lot of people to potential prosecution from lobbyists to donors, even family members of public officials.
READ MORE: Affirmative action in jeopardy after Supreme Court justices raise doubts
"If this guy is going to be prosecuted and convicted, where do you stop it? Because in the First Amendment, there is a phrase that you have an unfettered right to petition your government for a redress of grievances. It's a very fancy way of saying, lobbying," says attorney Craig Engle.
D.C. has a high number of lobbyists and other employees who go in and out of the government and could be affected by the Court's decision in this case. Government officials are usually required to take "cooling off periods" after they leave public work to prevent something like this from happening.
The Justices will likely decide the case sometime next year before the end of the term in late June or early July.